Quote:
Originally posted by godfrey n. glad
Is that the same way you felt after his previous book about Bush about a year or so ago, presenting him as a resolute and strong leader in the Afghanistant conflict? Most people were mad at him for making Bush look so good. Now, conservatives are mad that he didn't remain their shill. So, how do you explain why he would write such a "nice" book about Bush before, given your belief that he is a liberal shill? Let me guess, the liberal conspiracy got him to write a nice book just so that when he wrote a less nice one, people would believe him? 
|
Her answer of money would provide an answer. You only post on the most interesting of threads. It's cute.
-Rudey