Quote:
Originally posted by AXiD670
No, what I'm saying is had the email not been "in writing," there wouldn't have been all this bad press about it. I'm not saying anything about lying or covering anything up...
|
ok, that makes no sense. you're saying not to put anything incriminating, given the substance of this incident, in writing because_____then someone can find out about it, right?
where as, had there been no email involved, everyone who is lying could've easily stuck to their "version" of what "really" happened. the only reason there's media coverage, or "bad" press, as you put it, is because there was a wrong committed, and everyone was INSTRUCTED to lie about it. why is media coverage deemed "bad" if it exposes deception or abuse, especially given the fact that in this case, you're dealing with potential health risks that could effect numerous people?