Quote:
Originally posted by James
To him it was . . because you went on a date . . and then kept talking to him . .. and then went on another date two weeks later . .. and kept talking to him.
I am not saying you did anything wrong. We all may do stuff. . . but you asked whether it was leading him on and it was.
|
I don't agree. By your logic, unless you're really, really into the person right from the start, you should cut off all contact lest you be accused of leading someone on, right? Where does that leave the large number of women on GC who feel that sparks develop over time and who like to continue dating someone they're not really into at first (and I don't mean you, maggieaxid)? If a woman tries to "develop" sparks with a guy and it never happens, you'd just say she was leading him on the whole time, which is silly.
I think that the concept of "leading someone on" is bullshit, unless someone is blatantly lying to you about where the relationship is headed. Each person should do what she wants and hang out with someone if she feels like it -- if a guy reads more into her behavior than she intends, that's his problem, not hers.