Quote:
Originally posted by XOMichelle
yep, he does op eds, and I trust him.
I think the comments you have made are without content! The only worthwhile one was your first post, which had a few opinions that weren't very well supported. Many people would agree that the Kyoto protocol was a huge step in laying out procedures that will help the environment. The United States would not come on board because it values its economy over cleaning up the environment, and thought it would cause too much stress on companies. If you want to put content into a piece you must use examples, instead of simply telling others they are stupid because their posts are pseudo intellectual, and they are young. Please don't become a victim of your own criticism.
|
Are you kidding me?!? Who is most people?? Find me one economist that says that.
The US came on board because it realizes the economy is what drives helping the environment. The US realizes that 9 of the top 20 global polluters were not on board. The US realizes that its economy is very different from countries which have lapsed economies like Western Europe.
And please tell me, what US administration wanted to sign the protocal??
I could probably even sit here diagramming and doing the math for you but I don't do your work since it seems you're so busy...maybe you don't have time and maybe I'm not as trustable as Krugman so it won't matter.
-Rudey