NO, NO SATIN! DON'T MISCONSTRUE THE INTENT OF MY LAST MESSAGE. IF THERE ARE OR ANY FORMER DEAN'S OUT THERE, I'M QUITE SURE THEY WILL FEEL ME ON THIS.

FIRST, IF YOU'RE THE DP OR EVEN THE ADP, YOU DON'T LET NOONE GET WITH YOUR LINE UNLESS YOU AS THE DEAN SAYS SO. IT IS IMPORTANT THE PLEDGES UNDERSTAND THIS AS WELL FOR THEIR OWN SAFETY. SECONDLY, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE DP OR ADP HAVE CONTROL OVER "SESSIONS" IN ORDER TO COOL OFF OR REMOVE THOSE WHO RISK YOUR CHAPTER. DON'T GET ME WRONG THERE'S ONE IN EVERY "SESSION", BUT IT'S UP TO THE DP AND ADP AS WELL AS THE BB'S AND BS'S TO DEAL WITH THAT BRO/SOROR.

I GUESS MY ISSUE WITH THE WHOLE CHARLOTTE THING IS, IF YOU HAD PLEDGES WHO HAD BEEN ON FOR A NUMBER OF WEEKS (HALF WAY THROUGH), WHY ARE THEY STILL OPENING THE DOOR TO THOSE OTHER THAN THE DEAN, LET ALONE SOMEONE WHO IS SUPPOSEDLY HAZING THEM? I UNDERSTAND THE CHAPTER DID ALL IT CAN TO PUNISH HER, BUT IF SHE WAS A PROBLEM SINCE DAY ONE, THEN THE CHAPTER SHOULD HAVE DROPPED HER ON DAY ONE. IF YOU GUYS WERE TIGHT DURING YOUR PROCESS THEN SHE WOULDN'T SELL YOUR CHAPTER OUT, NOR WOULD YOU GUYS SELL HER OUT.


I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOUR ORG. BUT MOST MEMBERSHIPS ARE FOR LIFE. THERE ISN'T ANY EXPULSIONS AT THE REQUEST OF THE CHAPTER.
UNFORTUNATELY THAT GIRL PLACED YOUR CHAPTER IN A BAD PREDICAMENT WITH THE UNIV. HOPEFULLY SHE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE SITUATION.