
03-17-2004, 12:14 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,516
|
|
|
Re: Re: Does size necessarily equate quality?
Quote:
Originally posted by Diamond Delta
I *think* someone else said this in another thread and I liked it.
I think people should just focus on why their sorority is best for them not why it's better, bigger etc. than anyone elses. I really do not see the difference between a chapter of 130 and 160. But there is a BIG difference between a chapter of 30 and 60. I think we need to really just redefine "quality" as women. We need to stop judging each other based on society's and men's arbitrary standard of quality. We need to be looking at each other through different lenses. Instead of writing "OMG all the girls that were there were so sweet, cute, gorgeous etc." let's try to make an effort to only write things about them that are true personality characteristics-"They were so friendly, smart, funny ,interesting, caring, considerate, thoughtful, outgoing, ambitious, giving, generous". You NEVER see guys rush threads that say "well, all the guys were really hot, but I just didn't feel like I fit in." or "Everyone was so gorgeous! I just hope they liked me!" How idiotic would that sound?
I challenge each of you not write "beautiful, cute, pretty" when discussing up coming rush, PNM's, and the other girls on campus.
|
This is the most beautiful post I have ever read!
|