Quote:
Originally posted by Jhawkalum
Intimidation of any form, whether it's between pledges and actives, pledges and pledges, or actives and actives -- it's hazing.
NPC defines hazing as:
Hazing is defined as any action or situation with or without consent which recklessly, intentionally or unintentionally endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, or creates risk of injury, or causes discomfort, embarrassment, harassment or ridicule or which willfully destroys or removes public or private property for the purpose of initiation or admission into or affiliation with, or as a condition for continued membership in a chapter or colony of an NPC member fraternity
If AGD really sat its new members down in a circle, and then told them how to vote, and then singled out Lumpkin -- that is hazing!!
Assuming the accusations about intimidation against Alabama's XO and AGD chapters are true, they certainly would be in violation of the NPC policy on hazing.
|
I don't think there was a question as to whether or not the actions were hazing. I believe 33girl simply misunderstood the events which took place in the article... I DO NOT think she was making excuses for what happened...
Lighten up
We don't need to have the NPC rules quoted... I think most of us on here are quite familiar with the rules and regulations against hazing...