Quote:
Originally posted by midwesterngirl
I think they are thinking they were attacked BECAUSE they were allied with the US.Meaning if they hadn't been,the attack wouldn't have happened. ETA:I didn't know how to say that without making it sound like I was speaking for the Spanish people.I am not in the least,just interpreting what I think the news was trying to say.
|
true, true.....it was also stated in the article that the polls showed that 90% of the population didn't want anything to do with the iraqi situation in the first place and were testy they were ever involved. talk about drAma.....
but still....maybe i'm in the huge minority with this one....but i don't care what your reason for using terrorism in my country is......whether it's my association with another country or
whatever....you attack me, kill my countrymen, and i'm not gonna just do what they want, which is back away from the situation. ya know?
their association prob was why they were attacked....but there is no justification for terrorism....and that's why i am confused as to why they are so adamant about going back to "neutral"...once al qaeda or whoever sees they are like this, they are prey to everything, IMO.