[SummerChild]

Originally posted by Sistermadly
Pitts is one of my favorite columnists -- who happens to be African American. I'm happy to see one of "us" come out so strongly in calling us out on our own bigotry...


LEONARD PITTS

For release 03/12/04

'CIVIL' WAR BETWEEN GAYS AND BLACKS

By Leonard Pitts Jr.

Tribune Media Services

Call it an object lesson in the quality of equality.

I refer to last week's Senate subcommittee hearing on the proposed constitutional amendment outlawing same-sex marriage. And specifically, to an exchange between two leaders of the black community.

The first, Hilary Shelton, director of the Washington bureau of the NAACP, argued that the amendment "would use the Constitution to discriminate." Which brought a sharp retort from the Rev. Richard Richardson, chairman of political affairs for the Black Ministerial Alliance of Greater Boston Inc. Defining marriage as the union of a woman and a man, he said, "is not discrimination. And I find it offensive to call it that."

If you polled black folk, Richardson's view would doubtless prove typical. Though it's not generally appreciated by the wider world, blacks are among the most socially conservative Americans there are. Particularly on gay issues. Indeed, if you want to start a fight, suggest to a group of black folk that there are parallels between the civil rights movement and the gay community's struggle for equality.

Even blacks who are sympathetic to the gay cause often bristle at the comparison. As the Rev. Jesse Jackson recently put it, "Gays were never called three-fifths' human in the Constitution."

Those who are not sympathetic are even harsher. Gene Rivers, a Boston minister, accuses gays of "pimping" the civil rights movement.

Granted, the comparison between the black struggle and the gay one is inexact. But here's the thing: Every freedom movement from Poland's labor uprising to America's feminism to China's Tiananmen Square protests has been compared to the civil rights movement. When Czechoslovakians threw off communist rule in 1989, they sang "We Shall Overcome." Yet no one bothered to point out that the Czechs were never slighted in the U.S. Constitution, much less to accuse Poles of "pimping" the civil rights movement. What's that tell you?

It tells me this stinginess about the movement only arises when gays seek to embrace it. And that black people - some of us, at least - ought to be ashamed.

How can we of all people, we who know the weight of American oppression better than almost anyone, stand in the path of those who seek simple equality? How can we support writing anyone out of the Constitution when it took us so long to be written in?

And how can we stand with the very people - social conservatives - who not so long ago didn't want us in their churches, their schools, their parks or their restaurants? Yet more and more, we act and sound just like them.

We use our Bibles to justify our bigotry, just as they did.

We describe equality as unnatural, just as they did.

We invoke the sanctity of tradition, just as they did.

And we are wrong, just as they were.

Worse, we have wrapped our community in a conspiracy of silence, made being homosexual something one simply does not discuss. So that if you are black and gay or black and lesbian, there is often no sane thought of "coming out," no safe place to be who you are. The black community has no resources for you, no tolerance of you, no compassion for you. Yes, there are exceptions, but not enough. Not nearly.

Is it any surprise, then, that blacks lead the nation in new cases of HIV and AIDS?

Too many of us fail - or refuse - to see the great generality that overarches the specificity of our struggles. Meaning that it doesn't matter whether you are gay or black or woman or Jew or even Czech: people have a right to be free.

This is the principle gay people are fighting to vindicate. And no, it isn't the civil rights movement, but make no mistake: it's definitely "a" civil rights movement.

Except that this time, black people are on the other side.

(Leonard Pitts is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132. Readers may contact him at (888) 251-4407 or via e-mail at lpitts@herald.com.)

© 2004, The Miami Herald

Distributed by Tribune Media Services, Inc.

These types of arguments annoy me because it seems that some people think that just because Black people were discriminated against (and continue to be discriminated against) that that requires us to adopt all views of others, whether we truly believe in them or not.

Black people have a right to be *discriminating* in our views just like any other race has that right.

Our oppressive history in this country does not lead to a result that we must now be accepting of everything under the sun. Just like we don't all vote Democrat or Republican, we don't all believe the same on the gay rights issue - and we all have a right to believe whatever we want - no matter our oppressive history.

When it comes to gay people's right to have affection for who they want to, then it's supposed to be a free world and they can do/think as they please BUT when it comes to people expressing their opinions on the matter and accepting it or not, then *it's no longer a free world and we can *not* do/think as we please*. What gives?

What's good for the goose .... You can't have it both ways IMO.

SC