Quote:
Originally posted by tld221
isnt that kinda sexist and elitist? or is it okay, because youre "allowed" to include/exclude on these grounds?
what if a potential rushee has some of these attributes as a legacy (or even if she wasnt)?
dont insult her femininity or self worth on the basis of her flaws or what you dont think is ladylike. (cause we all have them)
|
We certainly do all have faults. What we also have in common on this board is that, for the most part, we are or want to be members of organizations who choose their members based on the attributes presented. I don't know if you are a member of a GLO (it appears from your posts that you are). Please don't tell me that your GLO has NO deliberative process for membership, because I think that you do. You take your members based on certain criteria particular to your organiztion. All of that includes "judging" the potential members in some way. If you are a member of a GLO then you have voted on new members. What criteria did you use, if not your first, second or third impression of them and/or the recommendations of your members?