View Single Post
  #15  
Old 01-22-2004, 03:14 PM
PhiPsiRuss PhiPsiRuss is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Listening to a Mariachi band on the N train
Posts: 5,707
Send a message via ICQ to PhiPsiRuss Send a message via AIM to PhiPsiRuss Send a message via Yahoo to PhiPsiRuss
Quote:
Originally posted by breathesgelatin
I do think the relative sizes of SigEp and ADPhi is a factor.
I agree, and have given this some thought.

My guess, and its only a guess, is that Alpha Delta Phi Fraternity made a procedural mistake when they initiated these men. Sig Ep, like most NIC groups, followed their standard operating procedure of maintaing the membership of the active members, when the charter was revoked or suspended. Sig Ep probably assumed that Alpha Delt understood this. Alpha Delt, on the other hand, is so small, that they may not have a standard operating procedure for this type of scenario, and Alpha Delt may not have anticipated Sig Ep's assumptions. The Alpha Delt officer(s) is charge, may have made some incorrect assumptions, and permitted the chartering. When Sig Ep brought Alpha Delt up on charges to the NIC, Alpha Delt may have then realized what had happened, and then began to back-track on their actions. This is my guess, but time will probably prove me partially, if not completely, wrong.
Reply With Quote