Quote:
Originally posted by knowledge234:
Sorry AKA2d, but the original obviously wasn't what was wanted or else there would be no need for improvement. According to the facts of 1913, AKA was unincorporated, was not a legal entity, had no way of establishing a relationship between the graduates and undergraduates, seemed more of a derivation of Alpha Phi Alpha (Alpha Kappa Alpha) than something unique, and was more concerned with being a social club.
|
Alrighty now, sounds like someone has read
In Search of Sisterhood....
I'm going to keep it real for a minute. There are about 44 women who really and truly know what happened. Alas, they are not walking this earth with us, may God rest their souls. My question is, why is this up for debate on this forum? AKA has her agenda and Delta has hers. If someone with no interest in either sorority took a look at each sorority's accomplishments, it is clear each organization has made TREMENDOUS strides on all fronts and both continue to do so. Each sorority is WONDERFUL and ILLUSTRIOUS. The only place where one sorority is "better" than the other is in the hearts and minds of the respective members. I suggest we leave this debate where it started: as FRIENDLY competition between AKAs and Deltas. We don't need assistance from 3rd parties. We can tease each other very well on our own, thank you.
------------------
Kelli
Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.
12-
Delta Nu-94
MAL,
Southern Region
Savannah State University c/o 1997