Quote:
Originally posted by Thrillhouse
Thats the beauty of the argument. Everyone has their own take on which two teams should be there.
In my eyes, OU dominated the whole year and was talked about as possibly one of the best teams ever. If 3 teams all have one loss, why does it matter when they lost? I truly believe that OU and USC are still the two best teams in the country but thats just my opinion. LSU beating the same team twice doesn't do anything for me, Georgia wasn't that great of a team this year.
We can go on an on about this but there hasn't been this much debate and outrage since the 97 split national title which was the reason for the BCS system.
|
this ou team isnt anywhere near one of the best teams ever. i read an article about this actually, when the 03 sooners where compared to 95 nebraska and 71 nebraska, teams that are considered the best ever. 95 and 71 nu each played 4 teams in the top 10, 03 ou, 0 teams. 71 and 95 nu average score/game, over 50, 03 ou, under 50. the list goes on, in all categories compared, 03 ou was no better than 2nd in one category, and 3rd in the others.
i agree that this sooner team is good, but to say that theyre one of the best ever, is simply overrating them. personally i believe 95 nebraska is the best ever, and the computer rankings have 95 nebraska the best ever, there was no team that could even keep the score respectable against them, and they never got blown out either.
i still cant see the arguement about how the top 3 teams all have one loss, that may be so, but at least two of them won their conference titles. ive said it before and ill say it again, if you cant win your conference title, then you dont deserve to go to the title game, no matter what you did the rest of the season, nebraska shouldnt have gone two years ago, and ou shouldnt be going now, and if they win it, the title will be tainted in my eyes....