Quote:
Originally posted by Love_Spell_6
Uhh..I thought Kelz was saying all along that it wasn't him in the video....but if he's going to argue that the girl might have been of age...I guess he's changing his tune.
|
Maybe, maybe not. That is the magic of a legal argument. At this stage he can argue to the judge-
It wasn't me.
If it was me, she was legal.
If it was me and she was legal, it shouldn't be illegal to tape it.
BAsically, at this tage he can argue all the alernatives in order to find some basis to get the case thrown out. ONce he starts presenting his theory of the case to the jury he will have to deide which version of the story he is going with and stick to it.