Alright, I tried to remained civil and I tried to stick to the issues without resorting to insults or trying to take cheap shots, unfortunately you could not restrain yourself to the bounds of debate.
You asked:
"If you have something to say as to why Israel is violating international law please let me know. "
I responded with two examples, and two from "Palestine". As for the UN, the US has veto power over security resolutions for any action (hence the security council). If for example a motion was presented to the UN calling for the deployment of peacekeepers anywhere, that is a security issue and the US can veto it. If a motion calls for a embargo against a nation, the US can veto it. If a motion calls for the withdrawal troops or the demilitarization of a region that is a security issue and once again the US can veto it.
Apparently you do not understand the workings of the security council and the concept of veto power.... if one of the five permanent members veto a motion then it is defeated..... and the US is a permanent member of the security council. Also for your hopeful education here is a link to a list of all the vetos that the US has used regarding Israel:
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/UN/usvetoes.html
Now as for debate that has been going on in this thread, I found two links that may be of interest to the parties involved in the debate.
Here is a link to the UN proposed partitioning of Palestine in 1947:
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/partmap.html
And for furthering the debate here is a link to the text of Resolution 181:
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/partition.html
Rudey please note that I took these from the Jewish Virtual Library, so you cannot question the source (I hope). These are also links that I could see no discernable bias in the actual document… now I know there are other documents on the site, but I wanted to present these because they deal with some of the arguements that have been presented.
If further debate of this issue is needed, why not make a separate thread to specifically deal with it.
PS> Rudey, you're asinine and juvenile attacks are not only uncalled for but a little sad. I've never attacked your service to your country (or lack there of), nor have I taken shots at your GLO membership or pride (whatever GLO that happens to be).