Quote:
|
What if we put a filter on this forum.....kinda like a bad word filter, except it limits sentences to nothing more than 80 words???? Decadence would still be muffeled (sic) and the rest of us would have words to spare.
|
"AXJules" this is one of the main reasons I put you on ignore quite a while ago. Unfortunately I still see your posts when I'm not logged in (browsing as a guest). This is my point. No attacks made toward you, it's gotta be a couple of months since I put you on ignore so we wouldn't butt heads (I don't come here for that) but you still come out of nowhere and make little personal snipes. I could make one now and am itching to but I'm trying to be a lil' mature.
Quote:
|
correct me if I'm wrong but I thought John couldn't ban IP addresses, meaning someone on the same computer can keep coming back again and again.
|
Okay then. You're wrong. Banning IP address is possible, it just has limited usage... if someone has a dialup connection the IP address can change each time and banning a
range of IP adresses can block out legitimate people too. Even if the user isn't on dialup there're ways to get round it after being banned by their IP address (which I won't post here).
Quote:
|
Rudey "...encylopedia...":
|
::shrug:: You post something on a forum people might respond. I did.
Imthechamp: Your humor in the last couple of posts
wasn't lost on me but I will still for the record just comment to you that
I don't PM people that person A sleeps with person B or any other gossip via PMs nor (as you seem to think and suggested before) do I spend all my time clicking Report post on you (I reported one post period,
ages ago when two insults were made by you to me - one I ignored as if I dish it I should take it; the other was reported only since it was bigoted and over-the-line. So far as I recall that's all I've ever reported on you and it was reported cuz of the post itself not who it came from). But I realise you still think I'm Cashmoney (despite John saying otherwise) so I'm not too bothered.
