View Single Post
  #10  
Old 10-14-2003, 07:14 PM
madmax madmax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,373
Quote:
Originally posted by sigep653
I know everyone's entitled to their own opinion, but I'm not happywith this comparison of my national fraternity. I seriously doubt SigEp HQ would act petty or immature toward the W & L former SigEps or ADPhi. I would imagine that HQ's taking this position because of insurance and paperwork problems. It might possibly be a risk managment concern-since they didn't go alumni, they could possibly still be considered members of SPE. But, since they are still a functioning fraternity chapter (the guys are holding rush, etc.), HQ is concerned that they are now open to liability, since the guys could legally still be considered SigEps, (because the offer of alumni status was rejected) but SigEp HQ has no control over the chapter or any way to limit their liability, since the guys have "affiliated" with ADPhi.

In Phi,
SigEp653
If SigEp is worried about insurance, risk management or whatever then all they have to do is stop making excuses and officially cut the ties and let the members go with ADPhi.
SigEp is acting petty. They don't want these guys but at the same time they are trying to prevent them from joining a different national fraternity. That is lame.
Reply With Quote