Quote:
Originally posted by adduncan
Oh, come on, GP, you know better than that!
If the statement doesn't apply to you, then it doesn't mean YOU personally.
This is why these "discussions" get so mean. Did I quote you in that post? No. Did I say "Geeky Penguin means this" in my post? No. Could I have had other people in mind when I typed this? Absolutely. So why go with the "Oooo--you attacked me, so Take THAT!!" approach when it probably wasn't referring to you at all?
My turn to roll my eyes.
|
With all due respect you did say this in your previous comment "I'm guessing you (and anyone else on this thread) hasn't spent alot of time studying faith of any sort, since many here are avowed athiests or agnostics." In a sense that can be directed at/to anyone that has commented on this thread.
Yes I am a lapsed Catholic but I have studied my fair share of faith(s). I've even gone on to study faiths unrelated to Catholicism and the like.
Just pointing out the reason as to why Geeky might have taken your comment the way she did.
Onto the fact of the article, when you have a member of the church telling an Aids infected Choirmaster to not use condoms while having sex with his wife because HIV can get through - you have got to be kidding me right? So is he supposed to go at it raw and increase his wife's risk 100 fold, at least?!