Quote:
Originally posted by RACooper
Alright I've wacthed the bickering for long enough.....
Yes I did see the original broadcast of Kay speaking about the findings in Iraq (thanks god for the CBC and BBC). What he did say that there was no cedible evidence of WMD found as of yet in Iraq, and he then went to talk about some of the various "finds" (including the so-called UAVs and the British balloon trucks). It was long and it was boring.... but pretty much in keeping with what the media has been reporting up here (and yes we do get that crap called Fox news).
CBC and BBC usually keep video or transcripts so i'll see if I can track them down and post a link......
|
I believe that you have that wrong. Kay did not say that there was no credible evidence for the existence of weapons (at least not in the two interviews that I watched). He said, that weapons had not yet been found. There is a huge difference between no credible evidence of weapons and not yet finding a weapon. He did speak of pieces of "evidence" for the weapons program that Iraq continued to conduct in defiance of the UN mandate, including at least one biological agent that had been found and others that they had evidence of , labs filled with banned equipment and other banned material, etc.. The point that I have been making here is that the media too often reports what they want the public to hear, and that Kay himself is amazed that the media in general has only told a small part of the story, omitting what has been discovered.