Cashmoney, I'm guessing you really don't want to name names here, but I for one think that it would be helpful to understand your problem if I knew exactly what you're talking about when you make these references. Obviously I'm not a mod, and I don't feel that I'm part of any hierarchy or clique, and I'm a little lost. I can't say that I've ever had a problem with any of the bannings that have happened here, but I'm sure there are many posts that have been deleted (or maybe ones that should've been, according to others) and I just haven't seen them.
In other words, if you can point me to specific threads with specific offensive posts, I could better understand you.
BTW, this is one of the most interesting threads that's been in chit chat for a while.
Quote:
Originally posted by cashmoney
So if a few different groups of friends here decide to complain about posts made by certain people, it's ok for their posts to be deleted and/or banned? But if one person finds one of the other posts to be flamatory or offensive, and the mod doesn't feel the same, nothing should happen? Regardless of whether or not the posts in question did in fact break GC rules/terms of agreement? So basically all your saying is that if enough people complain about person X, he/she will have something done to them. But if person X feels the same about one them, since he's the only one complaining they then get away with stuff? This has been going on for a long time.
If you want to talk about policy, read the terms of agreement and see how many here break them. From your post it seems as though you're ok with an hierarchy. I would assume you're ok with that because you're one of the people who has in the past got away with a lot of stuff. And that would be correct. A lot of people who get away with a lot of stuff have steered clear from posting in this thread, mainly non-mods.
|