Quote:
Originally posted by PSK480
Ummm... The good economy that clinton had was from the effects of what G.H.W. Bush did as President. What happens to the economy during the first about half year to year can't be controlled by the president in power. It is set up by the previous president. Thus the recession we went into at the beginning of G.W's term was set up by Clinton. Think about it for a minute. You can ask almost any economist and they will agree that Hoover wasn't at fault for the depression, he was just in office. It was too soon into his presidency for him to really effect the economy. So Clinton was given a good economy, squandered it and handed off a bad economy. Simple logic here folks.
oh yeah and also who's party name is relevent in our nation. Republican is not Democratic. We do NOT live in a democrocy people, we live in a Republic. We do not vote on every single thing that needs to be decided we elect representatives of the people to vote for us. Thus making the U.S.ofA. a Republic.
|
Party name relevent? Boy are you are just tring to dig for something to argue about. lol
Oh yah the nearly 8 years of good economy was because of the elder Bush even though he was only in office for 4 years. And who's fault was it the economy got bad during Bush? Can't blame Carter thats to far back beside the economy was pretty good during Regan's reign. And even if Clinton was the reason the economy went bad(which I will never believe) W has done nothing to improve it. Oh he was so convinced his tax cuts would help, but the economy just got worse. Maybe the newest tax cuts will make it even worse. But hey he can start another war to make him popular.
