Quote:
Originally posted by FuzzieAlum
Honeykiss, I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand your last post. Maybe we are looking at the gang comparison from two different angles? I considered these high schoolers to be one gang initiating a new, younger set of members, and I thought you were looking at it the same way. Do you consider that they are one gang beating up on another instead?
|
I am looking at it from one group beating up another.
If this was the Cheerleading squad (for example) and juniors cheerleaders were made to come out for the powderpuff game and get beat up, then I could see were this example could be classified as hazing. But this was just "random" seniors inviting juniors to beat them up.
I guess some people are looking at this at the fact the "organization" that both groups (juniors and seniors) belonged to was the high school.
And again, even if this was some sort of organized group, why is the media calling this hazing and not assault?
Remember not you ( "you " in general and not specifically you Fuzzy), but the media?
***********
Tom, behaving in a brutual, savage manner is not mutually exclusive to just a certain group of people. Is just isn't.