Quote:
Originally posted by pinkyphimu
i guess my point is that they are obviously not doing that great of a job at lobbying for a decrease in cost!
|
I personally think they've done a
wonderful job. I know that I have haggled with my insurance company for a few months about increasing coverage, and lo and behold, it was done! I believe that a big influence on MAJOR insurance companies (BCBS/Aetna/etc) to cover BC for nonmedical reasons has been because of groups like PP, not to mention major lawsuits. I'm not saying they're perfect. But for good insurance carriers, they've done a damned good job.
---------
Back to the topic at hand:
If the forensic pathologist's suggestion that her body expelled the fetus holds true, like in the same way the body expels or liquefies its own organs, then the circumstances regarding cause of death for the baby would be different from the cause of death of Sharon Tate's baby. So, someone doesn't have to "help" the fetus out of the womb in order for it to be expelled from the body. After three months of decomposition, especially underwater, no help was needed.
I imagine that he will be charged for a double murder, which, depending on the circumstances of death, may be an accurate charge. I am very concerned, however, about the ramifications of such a charge, and what the extreme pro-life faction could do with such a conviction.