Quote:
Originally posted by OohTeenyWahine
If a discussion on "THINGS NOT TO DO" is necessary, then by all means, do it. Personally, I don't think it's necessary to use this isolated incident [and at the same time have their name dragged through the mud] as the only example.
|
But, as stated before, we have hazing posts that mention names of specific groups all the time -- does that constitute "dragging somebody's name through the mud?" If XYZ headquarters contacted the moderators of this board and said, "Please remove the post about XYZ hazing in the Risk Management forum; we don't appreciate the name of our organization being degraded like that," would you, if you knew full well that the hazing act in question really happened and that there was information all over the internet pertaining to the hazing act?
I definitely agree that the pictures should have been deleted. I don't think any of us are arguing with that. It's just that this is something that happened and that can't be denied, the pictures are all over the internet, and there are even discussions about that very picture on this board (not mentioning the chapter name, fortunately, but it does mention the organization name). I don't see why it shouldn't be discussed here -- I don't see a difference between that and the hazing posts.