If a discussion on "THINGS NOT TO DO" is necessary, then by all means, do it. Personally, I don't think it's necessary to use this isolated incident [and at the same time have their name dragged through the mud] as the only example.

The moderator uses his/her own discretion in deleting or closing threads. I know that I've been approached by my own IHQ regarding certain questionable posts...and even though I didn't think it was necessary to take them down, I still found myself in an uncomfortable position.

We've all seen how things can get ugly with certain topics here on GC. Great discussion topic or not, it's always a tough situation when national officers get involved, and none of us really wants to step on anyone's toes!