View Single Post
  #34  
Old 03-03-2003, 06:32 PM
carnation carnation is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,440
Re: That's what I meant...

Quote:
Originally posted by Blue Violet
I mean we have sooo many advisors that are like freaking
We made a rule that alumni have to be invited or they are not to be at -you name it function-including rush. Now we do invite most of them of course, but we are tired of intereference.

And while I am ranting: big southern universities that have the alumni do the cut list before any of those poor girls have a chance to go through rush. Pathetic. I do not want my alumni choosing who is my sister. I want to choose.If they are legacies great, if not great. I mean recs are great but who is gonna submit a shitty rec.? Even the nastiest person has someone who likes her and will write her a rec. You have to go buy what you think of them. Not someone else.

Alumni have a great place, but running the chapter is not it. The actives should be running it.


I think your nationals would have something to say about that. There are rules by universities and nationals that require alum presence at many functions.

Also, lots of people will submit a "shitty" rec. You'd be surprised.

There are good and bad and sides to alums helping choose sisters. If you haven't been on the inside of a huge Southern rush, it's impossible to know the logistics and reasons.
Reply With Quote