Quote:
Originally posted by pialpha92
James - I refer to your comments that all small chapters "suck ass"
|
I wouldn't be too upset with him . . . I've found that fraternity men have little concept of what it's like to be a huge chapter, and therefore don't understand the "less sisterhood in large chapters" complaints very well. On our chapter, for example, out of about 25 fraternities, only 2 of them have over 100 members, and maybe three more are over 80. Out of 11 sororities, about 7 of them are over 100, all but one (or maybe all?) over 80. So for the fraternities, anything over 60 is considered pretty big, whereas for the sororities it takes almost twice that.
Most campuses are similar.
So the likelihood of most men ever belonging to a chapter of over 100 is fairly small, at least when compared to a women's chance of belonging to a sorority of over 100.
Personally, my chapter isn't even at campus total (120) and I feel like we're way too big already . . . I wish sororities on our campus could be capped at 60. Unfortunately that's not really plausible.