Quote:
Originally posted by KSig RC
Your logic is appalling - take a freaking class. Look, you can't fix this because you can't piece together a cogent argument. "Fully erect"? Kick me in the face - ridiculous comment. If you can't argue this subject like a real person, quietly exit the thread and go back to converting heathens.
It doesn't bother me - NOT IN THE LEAST - it's just like any other profession, be it law, medicine, taking out the trash, or fighting other nations. YOUR MORALITY IS NOT THE ONLY MORALITY.
[/B]
|
A logic class is so key, so key.
I agree with everything that Rob says and I wanted to say it but he got to if faster tham me (bastage).
The argument regarding children not being able to see it is no agrument at all. There are a lot of other things that children can't do before a certain aga and that is called law. They are restriced to do these until they reach the legal ege to do so.
Remember this for the next time you argue morals and ethics from a legal standpoint: Ethics and morals are hardly the standards or basis in which laws are created and Laws are not always created from an ethical and/or moral standpoint.
Children are also not allowed to view acts of sex before the age of 18 (yet many still do). So, just because children are not allowed to see this sort of act - is the act of sex unethcial?