|
Here's a thought,
If Hazing really taught respect of Elders, then when no hazing rules were brought down - why do some who had be hazed go against it?
Seems like hazing didn't really teach them to respect the Elder's decisions then...
In many cases, Hazing does reach the goals it obtains. However, it's comes to the idea of whether the ends justify the means? For many groups, hazing goes against the values and ethics of a group. Why would a group go against its own morals?
Hazing can be harmful and damaging to a person, and for that reason alone, it should not be allowed. Why any one would ever WANT to harm a person is BEYOND me.
And what is the PC meaning of hazing? What would you consider a more reasonable definition? Let's get specific.
|