Quote:
Originally posted by DeltaSigStan
I still say we should use ESPN's proposed system of using every bowl game as a playoff game, with the national title game switching between the current BCS title games.
The only reason Nebraska won those two titles in the 90s was because they had such a soft schedule. The title they shared with Michigan was BS, the Wolverines should have won outright.
The BCS is complete bull, but it's the best we're gonna have until we have a playoff system, and the revenue brought in by bowl games apparently is too much to bring it to that format.
|
well, being from nebraska, i know a whole hell of a lot more than you about nebraska football. you see, in 1994 we beat up the colorado buffaloes, a buffalo team with kordell stewart, michael westbrook, and rashaan salaam, granted none of them are too great as pros, but they were dominant in college, and they beat them. heard of the florida gators? yeah, who beat them in the fiesta bowl by a huge margin? oh, that was nebraska! most analysts, coaches, players and fans will say on record that some of the husker teams from the 90s are some of the best ever, and maybe some of the teams they played werent all that good, however they could beat them by like 76-21 and thats with using backups for at least the 2nd half, if not the first. And in 1997, there will always be controvesy around the true champions, however keep in mind that washington state came really close to beating michigan in the rose bowl, and if that were to happen, then nebraska wouldve been the outright champions. there you go buddy, i wait your response.
ktsnake- you have the right idea about how all the talented conferences have title games
deltasigstan- speaking of weak schedules, you go to san diego state right? thats a good team there buddy