reading between the lines
Well, first of all the headline NEVER said "penn state sorority girl", its actually said, "Woman Accused of Leaving Child". It just happens to mention that she left the child w/ sorority sisters.
Second of all, do you all believe EVERYTHING you read in the papers and verbatim? Just because she asked "if they had locked the door of the apartment" doesn't mean she didn't ask anything else or do anything else. Who are we to assume about what she did or didn't say. And I do believe that the sitters should get charged as well because they were the ones who left the child. Just because all mothers of young children (I have a 16-month-old and another one on the way) don't go out partying doesn't mean that because we hear of one that does, she is a horrible person. No of us know her, yet everyone here is sitting there passing judgement on her w/out hearing both COMPLETE sides of the story. Its like how mad we all get when we hear stereotypes about Greeks because you *KNOW* your organization is different but they aren't interviewing you or asking for your side.
My point is that yes, based on the information presented in the article it sounds like a horrible story but you need to stop and think about what the other side of the coin looks like.
Karen
|