Quote:
Originally posted by h2oot
1. Darwinism as professed has serious flaws. One is that, the pace as which some species evolved (especially humans) could not have occurred within the time-frame available. Evolution is a very slow process. It would seem that something else had to be involved to account for the changes.
|
The time frame is fairly large - we're talking hundreds of thousands of years just to get from homo erectus to homo sapiens sapiens. What is wrong with that time frame?
Quote:
Originally posted by h2oot
2. Genetic reseach has shown that there is an "Eve". All humans genetically trace back to a single person.
|
Actually, this is consistant with both Creationism and Evolutionary theory - Humans as a species would have to have a common ancestral root, as it is highly unlikely the same species could rise at different times from previous ancestors.
I believe the DNA evidence you're referring to is the study of mitochondrial DNA - that study is a central component of the "out of Africa" theory of human expansion, and doesn't violate evolutionary theory at all, as it relies on competitive advantage . . . eh i'll stop there, read up if you wnat more, it's really nerdy but somewhat interesting.
Anyway - the point is, I agree with your final point - i think we're a long way off from getting the theory "correct", probably hundreds of years, but it's the best thing we have for now.