<<What is the difference if everyone knows "morally challenged" means slut?>>
I applaud your "call it as I see it" mentality. But then, I'm not one to mince words with bunch of PC garbage. I DO think however, that it's better to follow the "praise in public, criticize in private" thing IF POSSIBLE. I know that in our membership roundtables, we were pretty open to discussing confirmed, first hand accounts of someone being a fool. Anything second hand is rumor and unreliable.
<<Personally, the sex life, drug life, spiritual life of another is not my business unless it is harmful to others>>
This can be a harmful mentality to any chapter. The "I don't care what you do on your time (even with the until it is harful to others)" thing is contradictory to the values we all profess - primarily REALLY caring about our fellow members. If someone is risking their welfare through rampant casual sex and/or drug use/abuse then each of us has a responsibility to help them. And is they are a rushee, the same should hold true - but in case you need another point, don't think for a minute that pledging a few drugies or "morally casual" folks won't impact the chapter's rep. Right, wrong or indifferent - perception is reality, and if it's perceived that you pledge the drugies or the loose, the chapter is often found guilty by association.
Brad
|