[cheerfulgreek]

Originally Posted by Phrozen Sands

I would need you to break your post down CG so I can understand it. I’m also not understanding how naraht is proving your point.

In chemistry, “cis/trans” means a real, physical flip you can see under a microscope. In gender talk, “cis” is just a social label, no physical flip, no real structure.

So when naraht brings up chemistry, it shows the word only makes sense when it describes a real structure, which gender identity doesn’t have. That’s why it proves my point.

Real science vs. made up marketing.

Originally Posted by Phrozen Sands

Because of that, I read naraht’s post 4 times and your post 6 times and what I’m getting out of what you’re trying to say is what I changed your post to. Am I right?
.

lol
Yes. They’re real science terms repurposed so ideological fluff pretends to be biological fact. But it’s pretty much rhetorical camouflage.