Quote:
Originally Posted by Sen's Revenge
So question.... (and you know me, so you know I am coming from a place of understanding and not disrespect)
Why should looks figure into it at all?
For example, what if there is a category that says whether or not a PNM has a professional or put-together hair style.
Then a black or biracial girl comes in with dreadlocks.
What happens when Karen with the clipboard decides to take points off because she has never seen a black hairstyle?
Or a Muslim woman who covers?
I guess what I am saying as an outsider to the process is that what Alpha Phi is alleged to be doing doesn't seem that much different from what the system does as a whole. It's just that one way is codified and organized and the other way is more casual.
|
I'm going to say it because that's how I roll and it's being forever tiptoed around within this debate in the NPC. Alpha Phi is using "attractive" as a criteria in the very narrowest of ways: attractive/hot white women. Their policy effectively disqualifies anyone who does not fit it, including women of color, women who wear religious garments, physically disabled women etc. Look at photos of these chapters and there is an alarming lack of any diversity, unless you're talking hair color. Dark skin isn't hot. Ethnic features aren't hot. Natural hair isn't hot. Hijabs aren't hot. Wheelchairs aren't hot.