I disagree. Really, I would rather hear names. Even if a PNM doesn't like my organization, it's not going to hurt my feelings.
I think that it actually might be valuable for groups to see what PNMs are saying about them, because it might give insight into what they could improve in the future. For example, a rushee might say that at ABC she talked to two sisters and she didn't like that as much as talking one on one. If someone from ABC read that, maybe they would reconsider their procedures.
I don't think that any of the women posting their rush stories here this year have said anything without tact and class. As such, there would be no harm in attaching a name to a story. Nobody is saying that any group is bitchy or anything; it's all stuff like "I didn't connect with so and so" or "so and so talked about [whatever] the whole time and I'm not really interested in that." As a member of one of those organizations, I think it could only help to get this feedback. I also think that it is more interesting to hear stories when you have a group to connect to the story. Especially if you're familiar with a campus, it's much more interesting to know what groups a PNM is discussing.
__________________
A hiney bird is a bird that flies in perfectly executed, concentric circles until it eventually flies up its own behind and poof! disappears forever....
-Ken Harrelson
|