[Kevin]

I think I'd be persuaded by argument that the first sister to sign the lease would have the better claim to live in. The Chapter incurred a duty to accommodate her disability when that lease was signed. By signing the second lease, does anyone else think there's a mutual mistake of a material fact in that Chi Omega at that time could not provide reasonable accommodations to the second sister? I don't see anyone is arguing that in the news articles, but that's what jumps out at me the most.