|
Bolingbaker,
Its an argument made by people that are pissed about having to join IFC. It is done to deliberately stall the process and cause problems.
That being said . . they don't have to join the IFC, but they lose benefits if all the other fraternities do . . because if they can get the sororities to agree they can limit the non-member's social calendar.
Good luck getting the sororities to agree to that! Especially with a popular group.
But no its really not a legitimate argument . . . membership assessment is not being done unfairly. Every chapter can be any size so its not a limited thing . . .
Why do you find their argument so compelling? Does that mean every fraternity should have its voting power changed every semester?
And for that to be legitimate representation then all the members that want to vote need to be at the relevant meetings . . and would be subject to rules of attendance and good standing.
Also the IFC could counter and say they that will be responsive to membership issues: You get one rep for every 250 members . . . seriously the person arguning for the IFC must have been a moron.
|