|
We make it about money because we don't have a more flexible approach . . . We assume that if we become flexible everyone is going to abandon their groups.
What I am saying, and again we are off topic, is that it would cost us nothing for a kind of inactive status where the person doesn't go to social events and only pay's national dues iand insurance. hence they aren't active but don't need to be expelled.
If you like they can have a pay as you go type of thing for formal and such activities as they might want to attend . . but payment has to be received in advance and it costs more that way.
|