|
Now, correct me if I'm wrong DeltaSigStan, but what I'm getting from what you are saying is that ethnic and MCGLOs should be governed the same way as GLOs regulated by NPC and IFC. Don't you think that depreciates from the value on diversity that these GLOs stand for?
Traditionally, ethnic and MCGLOs separated from NPC and IFC because they wanted something different and something more in tune for the values that they are looking for. You can even compare it to the way each and every one of us had searched for a GLO that we would be proud to call our own. By stating that you would prefer the ethnic and MCGLOs to be like NPC and IFC is just a little idealistic, especially since NPC and IFC act differently campus to campus to suit the needs that are found in those individulal campuses. Moreover, in wanting to have ethnic and MCGLOs to have the same governing bodies as NPC and IFC, you're stating point blank that such organizations just should have joined NPC and IFC and not have tried to branch out on their own.
I have the unique experience of being in an NPC sorority, but had looked strongly into being a part of an NPHC sorority, picking up information about the MCGLOs as I inquired. As a Filipina, I wanted to look into everything and make sure that I had covered all the bases. Unless one has explored the facets of each can one truly be able to state the facts. But does bashing or harsh criticism really help if it's not constructive? Answer that.
Last edited by SapphireSweetie; 08-08-2002 at 04:17 PM.
|