Quote:
Originally posted by DeltaSigStan
You know, I asked the same question about both NPC and IFC to the head of our IFC at SDSU, and I was told that an organization that has a tag in front of it (Multicultural, Christian, Latino, Asian) can't be members. Course I did ask about AEPhi, AEPi and ZBT, which he said was different because they are "traditional". I guess MAYBE there's some truth to that, but I'm guessing that's the wrong answer.
|
AEPhi doesn't have a "tag" in the sense that I think you mean it. We don't recruit only Jewish women; we will offer membership to any qualified woman who we feel will be a good sister, regardless of her religion. It's true that a lot of Jewish women tend to gravitate toward AEPhi, but that doesn't mean we only recruit Jews, nor does it make us a "Jewish sorority". The "tag" GLO's, in my (admittedly limited) experience, tend to recruit mainly or exclusively members of their specific religious or ethnic interest.
Quote:
Originally posted by newsun
Am I the only one who would be excited to see the NPC grow?
|
No... I think everyone's point is that it's unlikely to happen any time soon, because becoming an NPC member is so difficult, plus a lot of non-NPC national sororities may not wish to be bound by the unanimous agreements, so they may not even want to try to join NPC.