|
Correct me if I am misspeaking 1964, but I believe your point is that the break in social routine is in part to encourage thought and reflection. For my part, I find it telling that the leadership of 17+ organizations concur that a break is needed -- none of the HQs took a different or modifed position. The young women's justification that the directive is counter to the character of the school (high academics, achievers, et al) is not persuasive. One need only to look at another non-slouch of a university for recent enfant terrible behavior by ostensibly top students.
|