Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
Quote:
Originally Posted by honorgal
. No, it implies what I am actually saying, not whatever the heck it is that you keep trying desperately but incoherently to imagine I am saying - that all allegations should be taken seriously, and investigated thoroughly, and that some of them, based on the particular facts of each individual case, will turn out to not be rape.
|
Wait... You ARE making a general point from the Swarthmore example. So you agree with me. Ohhhhh, you almost had yourself confused there. |
.
Your mixing apples and oranges isn't very coherent to whatever the heck you are trying to say.
Quote:
|
Isn't it cool how your devil's advocate from that other thread conveniently disappears?
|
.
What a reach, don't strain yourself. With swarthmore example, I laid it out as a thought experiment. And specifically said lets stipulate that these are the facts.
Quote:
|
That you conflict yourself and, the sad part, are unaware of the conflict.
|
. And I'm sure that if I asked you to specify the conflict, that you'd just ignore in your typical passive aggressive fashion, so I won't bother.