Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
You are hopefully better at reading than that.
You said "such as the facts presented..." which implies that you are making a general statement from the Swarthmore example.
|
. No, it implies what I am actually saying, not whatever the heck it is that you keep trying desperately but incoherently to imagine I am saying - that all allegations should be taken seriously, and investigated thoroughly, and that
some of them, based on the particular facts of each individual case, will turn out to not be rape.
Quote:
It is not as though you are not "calling it rape" based on a full investigation.
|
. Well, duh, that's obvious. All we have to go on are what the magazine published.
Quote:
You are not "calling it rape" based on particular details for which you find implausible. Again, your "silent consent" and your disbelief in "silent victims".
|
People at colleges all over the country are having to make judgement calls and decisions (ours happen to be theoretical and without consequence for anyone). I'm not sure what your point is? I would not find the male student in that scenario guilty of rape. Neither did Swarthmore. You would., although you never did say what the punishment should be. So what is your point again?