[pinksequins]

We don't know that it is all false, just that there were sufficient substantive inaccuracies to cause even valid elements to be called into question. A little prudence and checks and balances could have avoided this particular result, and their apparent absence or failure at RS is profoundly disappointing. Exlurker, the dialogue and concerns exist because of the story and its journalistic management, not because you posted it. Discussions occurred on a wide range of forums. I hope you are not feeling you were wrong.