[Kevin]

We present as values based organizations and to a degree, that is exactly what we are because that is something which serves our members well and also encourages us to seek the right sort of member. But we aren't "values-based." We are social fraternities and sororities, it costs money to make our groups run and we do not operate for a profit. We should not be embarrassed to have membership selected from certain socioeconomic strata. It's what we are, it's what we've always been. We have become more diverse by choice and by opening up chapters at less selective schools. We've done a good job of staying relevant and responding to cultural changes.

This sort of message, however, really irks me. It's basically asking us to apologize or be ashamed that not everyone can afford to be a member. Should I be ashamed because I drive a nice car, live in a nice home, etc.? This author seems to be suggesting I should.