|
YNM -- your position is predicated on a number of faulty assumptions: that your system has never been tried (it has), that the larger invitation list for smaller chapters will result in a corresponding number of attendees (historically no), that your system will eliminate matchy outfit parties (not alone and could instead increase "frills") and smaller numbers mean sustainability. . As many experienced alumnae (women) have said in various ways in response, your form of recruitment led to significant disparities in parity, more (not less) focus on prestige and even closing of chapters.
|