Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
That's where I take issue. You're simply assuming the father has bailed on the situation. It is not always so simple.
|
She said "suppose he bailed." That is a possibility, not an assumption. And if he was somewhere scraping together the money to take the mother to court for his well-deserved parental rights, he is still not the one being charged.
I think it's unfortunate that this whole thing happened in the first place and even more unfortunate that the woman lost her job over it. I do agree with the post upthread about it being better to be out at the park with other children than sitting in McDonald's on a laptop all day. It's great that she's been getting donations but I hope she gets an offer for another job.