Ok. So I just went back and read all 16 pages. I should've done that before posting earlier. (I even read the entire Duke thread Kevin posted, just for fun.)
I don't think honorgal is a troll.
I don't think it's either fair or accurate to say that either the victim is lying or that the accused is lying. I agree with Low D Flat - it's possible that both parties remember the same event differently.
I don't think our colleges/universities should have to shoulder the responsibility of determining someone's innocence or guilt in regards to rape cases. Nor do I think it's appropriate to oust a student based on an accusation of rape.
Having a husband who has worked in college administration does not qualify someone as having a "front row" seat to the inner workings of administration. I've personally been a part of many university administrative meetings, and to think that that qualifies my husband as a knowledgeable commenter on such subjects is laughable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by honorgal
And that's usually what happens when a solution is devised for a non-problem.
|
It may be a non-problem in your eyes, but to a college/university administration, it's helpful and comforting to have a solution/response to situations regarding student-safety concerns.
Dr. Phil, in an attempt to bring something new to the discussion, are you familiar with the University of Kentucky's green dot/VIP program?
http://www.uky.edu/StudentAffairs/VI...n_greendot.php