[cheerfulgreek]

Originally Posted by ASTalumna06

Please, no. 'Jaws' is perfect just as it is. CGI would probably ruin the whole thing. It's like when they tried to make additional 'Jurassic Park' movies. Just terrible. .

I understand what you mean by CGI, but this is not what I mean by "remake". As I can remember, there were three Jurassic Parks, that ranged from 1993-2001, I believe. But those sequels were done from and based on the original as a continuation.

I see a remake as a new movie using the same story but with a different cast. I see a sequel as a movie in which the story of the first/original movie continues, with or without the original cast.

Originally Posted by Phrozen Sands

I think you and CG are talking apples and oranges. You're talking duplicates and sequels. Based on the way I read her post, I think she's taking remakes. Ex: original Django Unchained vs the remake of Django Unchained.

Isn't that the movie with Jamie Foxx in it? I didn't know there was an original one before that one. I thought that was it. But, yes, this is what I'm referring to.

Originally Posted by Phrozen Sands

I also think it depends on who the remake is done by.

This. I think if it was redone by the same director (Steven Spielberg), I think it would be really good.